No. 06CA024 - Fountain Springs Park Subdivision

A request by CETEC Engineering for Franklin O. Simpson to consider an application for an Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan by revising the North Rapid Neighborhood Area Future Land Use Plan to change the land use designation from Park Forest to Medium Density Residential with a Planned Residential Development on a parcel of land in the NW¼ SW¼, Section 26 and the NE¼ SE¼, Section 27, T2N, R7E, BHM, Rapid City, Pennington County, South Dakota being more particularly described as follows; Beginning at the Northwest corner of Tract B of Fountain View Subdivision as recorded in Book 29, Page 239, Said point being monumented with an Iron rod; Thence S72º10’55”W along the Right-of-Way of Harmony Heights Lane a distance of 319.49 feet to a point; Thence along the Right-of-Way of Harmony Heights Lane through a curve to the right having a radius of 229.63 feet, a distance of 3.70 feet; Thence S00º02’56”E 469.04 feet to a point on the South line of the NE¼ SE¼ of said Section 27; Thence N89º41’23”E 114.61 feet along said South line to a point on the East line of the NE¼ SE¼ of said Section 27 monumented with an Iron rod; Thence N89º55’39” E 390.12 feet along the South line of the NW¼ SW¼ of said Section 26 to a point; Thence N00º01’21”W 325.13 feet to a point; Thence S89º58’39”W 122.54 feet to a point; Thence N24º44’05”E 64.04 feet to a point on the 125 foot radius non-tangent curve of said Tract B that concaves to the Northeast; Thence along said curve to a chord intersect point N41º33’15”W at a distance of 100.51 feet; Thence N17º50’42”W 113.81’ along the West line of said Tract B to the Point of Beginning, more generally described as being located southwest of the intersection of Harmony Heights Lane and Sunny Springs Drive.


PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION:
Planning Commission
recommended that the Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan by revising the North Rapid Neighborhood Area Future Land Use Plan to change the land use designation from Park Forest to Medium Density Residential with a Planned Residential Development be approved.

VOTE: (6 to 0 with Anderson, Brewer, Fast Wolf, Hennies, Landguth and Waltman voting yes and none voting no)