No. 05SV002 - Park Meadows Subdivision
A request by Sperlich Consulting, Inc. for Jim Letner to consider an application for a Variance to the Subdivision Regulations to waive the requirement to install additional pavement, curb, gutter, sidewalk and planting screen easement along Creek Drive; to waive the requirement to install additional pavement and planting screen easement along East St. Patrick Street; and, to waive the requirement to install sidewalk along East St. Charles Street as per Chapter 16.16 of the Rapid City Municipal Code on Lots 1 through 5, Park Meadows Subdivision, located in the SW1/4 of the SW1/4, Section 5, T1N, R8E, BHM, Rapid City, Pennington County, South Dakota, legally described as Lot B of Lot 3 of Tract D located in the SW1/4 of the SW1/4, Section 5, T1N, R8E, BHM, Rapid City, Pennington County, South Dakota, more generally described as being located at 1720 East St. Patrick Street.

Staff recommends that the Variance to the Subdivision Regulations be continued to the March 7, 2005 City Council meeting as the stipulations of approval have not been met.

PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION:
 Planning Commission recommended that the Variance to the Subdivision Regulations to 1) waive the requirement to install additional pavement along East Saint Patrick Street be tabled; 2) to waive the requirement to provide a ten foot wide planting screen easement along Creek Drive and East Saint Patrick Street be tabled; 3) to waive the requirement to install sidewalk along East Saint Charles Street be approved; and, 4) to waive the requirement to install additional pavement, curb, gutter and sidewalk along Creek Drive be approved with the stipulation:

1.

Prior to approval by the City Council, the applicant shall sign a waiver of right to protest any future assessments for the installation of sidewalk along East Saint Charles Street and the installation of additional pavement, curb, gutter and sidewalk along Creek Drive.

VOTE: (7 to 0 with Anderson, Andrews, Brown, Hadcock, LeMay, Prairie Chicken and Schmidt all voting yes and none voting no)