Public Comment

No. 03CA041 - Fountain Springs Business Park
A request by Franklin Simpson to consider an application for an Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan to change the future land use designation on a 1.792 acre parcel of land from Park Forest to Medium Density Residential with a Planned Residential Development on a parcel of land described by metes and bounds as beginning at the southwesterly corner of Tract H of the Wesleyan Christian Center, Thence first course:  N76º34'25"E a distance of 263.55 feet to the SE corner of said Tract H; Thence second course:  N69º06'06"E a distance of 98.75 feet to the westerly right-of-way line of Sunny Springs Road; Thence third course:  S17º49'19"E a distance of 195.45 feet to an angle point of Sunny Springs Road right-of-way; Thence fourth course:  S27º11'30"W a distance of 14.14 feet to the north right-of-way line of Harmony Heights Lane; Thence fifth course:  S72º12'18"W a distance of 256.21 feet to a point of curvature on the north line of Harmony Heights Lane; Thence sixth course:  along an arc to the right, which radius is 170.00 feet an arc distance of 110.36 feet to a point of tangency on the north line of Harmony Heights Lane; Thence seventh course:  N70º21'42"W a distance of 53.48 feet to the east right-of-way line of Plaza Boulevard; Thence eighth course:  along the east right-of-way line of Plaza Boulevard, on an arc to the left, which radius is 333.35 feet an arc distance of 162.41 feet, and the chord bearing of N00º31'03"E a distance of 160.81 feet, to the point of beginning, said parcel of land containing 1.792 acres more or less, all lying in the NE1/4 SE1/4 of Section 27 and in the NW1/4 SW1/4 of Section 26, T2N, R7E, BHM, Rapid City, Pennington County, South Dakota, more generally described as being located along Harmony Heights Lane.

PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION:
Planning Commission recommended that the Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan to change the future land use designation on a 1.792 acre parcel of land from Park Forest to Medium Density Residential with a Planned Residential Development
be denied without prejudice.

Vote: (8 to 0 with Brown, Henning, Hoffmann, Nash, Prairie Chicken, Schmidt, Stone and Wevik voting yes and none voting no)