Staff Report Vicinity Map Aerial Photograph Land Use Site Plan Exhibit A Exhibit B Existing Future Land Use Plan No. 01CA033 - Section 19, T1N, R8E and Section 24, T1N, R7E
A request by Centerline, Inc. for Lazy P-6 Properties, LLC to consider an application for an Amendment to the Future Land Use Designation in the South Robbinsdale Neighborhood Area Future Land Use Plan, an element of the Comprehensive Plan: From Planned Residential Development with a maximum density of 6.7 dwelling units per acre to Mobile Home Park located in the South 420 feet of the NE1/4 of the SW1/4 and the SE1/4 of the SW1/4 of Section 24, T1N, R7E, B.H.M., Pennington County, South Dakota; From Planned Residential Development with a maximum density of 6.7 dwelling units per acre and Medium Density Residential with a Planned Residential Development to General Commercial located in the East 900 feet of the NE1/4 of the SE1/4 less Highway 16B Right-of-way and the East 900 feet of the SE1/4 of the SE1/4 of Section 24, T1N, R7E, B.H.M., Pennington County, South Dakota; From Planned Residential Development with a maximum density of 6.7 dwelling units per acre to Office Commercial located in the NW1/4 of the SW1/4 of the NE1/4 of the SE1/4; the West half of the NW1/4 of the NE1/4 of the SE1/4 less Highway 16B Right-of-way; and the North 900 feet of the NW1/4 of the SE1/4 less Highway 16B Right-of-way of Section 24, T1N, R7E, B.H.M., Pennington County, South Dakota; From General Commercial with a Planned Commercial Development, Park Site with alternative use of Mobile Home Residential and Office Commercial with a Planned Commercial Development to General Commercial located in the North 900 feet of the NW1/4 of the SW1/4 less Highway 16B Right-of-way of Section 19, T1N, R8E, B.H.M., Pennington County, South Dakota; From Office Commercial with a Planned Commercial Development and Park Site with alternative use of Mobile Home Residential to Light Industrial located in the South 420 feet of the NW1/4 of the SW1/4 and the SW1/4 of the SW1/4 of Section 19, T1N, R8E, B.H.M., Pennington County, South Dakota; From a Planned Residential Development with a maximum density of 6.7 dwelling units per acre to Medium Density Residential in a portion of the SW1/4 of the SW1/4 of the NE1/4 of the SE1/4; the West 420 feet of the SE1/4 of the SE1/4; the South 420 feet of the NW1/4 of the SE1/4; and the SW1/4 of the SE1/4 of Section 24, T1N, R7E, B. H. M., Pennington County, South Dakota; From a Planned Residential Development with a maximum density of 6.7 dwelling units per acre to Neighborhood Commercial located in the North 900 feet of the NE1/4 of the SW1/4 less Highway 16B Right-of-way of Section 24, T1N, R7E, B.H.M., Pennington County, South Dakota; From General Commercial with a Planned Commercial Development and Office Commercial with a Planned Commercial Development to General Commercial located in a portion of the S1/2 of the SW1/4 of the NW1/4 less Highway 16 B Right-of-way of Section 19, T1N, R8E, B.H.M., Rapid City, Pennington County, South Dakota; From Office Commercial with a Planned Commercial Development, Medium Density Residential, and Planned Residential Development with a maximum density of 6.7 dwelling units per acre to Office Commercial located in a portion of the N1/2 of the SW1/4 of the NW1/4 of Section 19, T1N, R8E, B.H.M., Rapid City, Pennington County, South Dakota; From Low Density Residential and Planned Residential Development with a maximum density of 6.7 dwelling units per acre to Medium Density Residential located in a portion of the S1/2 of the NW1/4 of the NW1/4 of Section 19, T1N, R8E, B.H.M., Rapid City, Pennington County, South Dakota; and, From Low Density Residential and Medium Density Residential to Low Density Residential located in the N1/2 of the NW1/4 of the NW1/4 of Section 19, T1N, R8E, B.H.M., Rapid City, Pennington County, South Dakota, more generally described as being located north and south of Catron Boulevard adjacent to the future 5th Street intersection.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION:
Planning Commission recommends that the Comprehensive Plan Amendment be denied.Vote: (8 to 0)