U.S. Highway 16 Study Area
Contour Map

 
NEW INFORMATION FOR
JANUARY 10, 2005
SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING

   
 

U.S. Highway 16
Neighborhood Area
Future Land Use Plan

U.S. Highway 16
Neighborhood Area
Future Land Use Map
Revised

Future Land Use
Neighborhood Areas

Bulleted Items
Regarding Public Comment at
Special Council
December 13, 2004
 


No. 04CA032 Comprehensive Plan Amendment

A request by City of Rapid City to consider an application for an Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan adopting the U.S. Highway 16 Neighborhood Area Future Land Use Plan on property generally described as being located north of Cathedral Drive, south along U.S. Highway 16 approximately one mile either side of U.S. Highway 16 to south of Reptile Gardens.


PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION:
Planning Commission recommended that the Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan adopting the U.S. Highway 16 Neighborhood Area Future Land Use Plan be approved as submitted with the following amendments:

1. That the property located in the E1/2 NE1/4 and the E1/2 SE1/4 of Section 26, T1N, R7E, BHM, Pennington County, South Dakota be designated as a Planned Residential Development with 4.8 dwelling units per acre with an option to designate park land within the property boundary;

2. That the property located in the W1/2 SE1/4 and the SE1/4 SE1/4 of Section 35, T1N, R7E, BHM, Pennington County, South Dakota, known as the proposed Hyland Park Subdivision, be designated as a Planned Residential Development with 2.5 dwelling units per acre;

 3. That the property located in the SE1/4 SW1/4, Section 26, T1N, R7E, BHM, Pennington County, South Dakota be designated as a Planned Residential Development with 2.5 dwelling units per acre; and

4. Staff bring forward proposed changes to the Major Street Plan as identified on the revised draft of the U.S. Highway 16 Neighborhood Area Future Land Use Map including changes to the density calculations to reflect the proposed land use designation changes identified on the referenced map and as amended.

VOTE: (6 to 2 with Brown, Rodriguez, Schmidt, Anderson, Prairie Chicken and Lemay voting yes and Hadcock and Nash voting no)