No. 11RZ024 - Stoney Creek South Subdivision

A request by Dream Design International, Inc. to consider an application for a Rezoning from Office Commercial District to General Commercial District for a portion of Lot 4 of Block 3 of Stoney Creek South Subdivision Located in the SW1/4 of Section 22, T1N, R7E, BHM, Rapid City, Pennington County, South Dakota, more fully described as follows: Commencing at the southwesterly corner of Lot 4, Block 3 of Stoney Creek South Subdivision, common to the northwesterly corner of Lot 3 of Block 3 of Stoney Creek South Subdivision, common to a point on the easterly edge of Bendt Drive right-of-way, and the point of beginning; Thence, first course: N01°34’53”E, along the westerly boundary of said Lot 4, common to the easterly edge of said Bendt Drive right-of-way, a distance of 40.08 feet; Thence, second course: along the westerly boundary of said Lot 4, common to the easterly edge of said Bendt Drive right-of-way, curving to the right, on a curve with a radius of 174.00 feet, a delta angle of 40°47’10”, a length of 123.86 feet, a chord bearing of N21°58’28”E, and chord distance of 121.26 feet, to the northwesterly corner of said Lot 4, common to the southwesterly corner of Lot 5, Block 3of Stoney Creek South Subdivision; Thence, third course: S70°48’41”E, along the northerly boundary of said Lot 4, common to the southerly boundary of said Lot 5, a distance of 124.48 feet; Thence, fourth course: S19°11’19”W, a distance of 116.69 feet, to the northeasterly corner of said Lot 3, common to a point on the southerly boundary of said Lot 4; Thence, fifth course: S89°21’43”W, along the southerly boundary of said Lot 4, common to the northerly boundary of said Lot 3, a distance of 125.70 feet, to the point of beginning, more generally described as being located southeast of the intersection of Catron Boulevard and Bendt Drive.


PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION:
Planning Commission recommended that the Rezoning from Office Commercial District to General Commercial District be approved in conjunction with the associated Comprehensive Plan Amendment.

VOTE: (9 to 0 with Brewer, Braun, Fink, Marchand, Popp, Rolinger, Scull, Swank and Weimer voting yes and none voting no)