No. 10CA046 - Section 28, T2N, R8E

A request by Dream Design International, Inc. to consider an application for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change the land use designation from General Commercial with a Planned Commercial Development to Light Industrial with a Planned Industrial Development for a portion of the SW1/4 of Section 28, T2N, R8E, BHM, Rapid City, Pennington County, South Dakota more fully described as follows: Commencing at the northeasterly corner of Lot 3 of GLM Subdivision No. 2, common to a point on the east-west section 1/4 line of Section 28, T2N, R8E, and the point of beginning; Thence, first course: S89°56’27”E, along the said east-west section 1/4 line a distance 204.58 feet, to the center-west 16th corner of said section 28; Thence, second course: S89°58’22”E, along the said east-west section 1/4 line a distance 1326.23 feet, to the center 1/4 corner of said section 28, common to the northwesterly corner of Lot 1 of Mall Drive Subdivision; Thence, third course: S00°01’24”E, along the westerly boundary of said Lot 1, common to the north-south section 1/4 line, a distance of 396.01 feet, to the southwesterly corner of said Lot 1, common to a point on the northerly edge of East Mall Drive right-of-way; Thence, fourth course: S89°53’19”W, along the northerly edge of said East Mall Drive right-of-way, a distance of 1530.15 feet, to the southeasterly corner of said Lot 3; Thence, fifth course: N00°07’04”W, along the easterly boundary of said Lot 3, a distance of 399.88 feet, to northeasterly corner of said Lot 3, common to a point on the east-west section 1/4 line, and the point of beginning, and, a portion of the SW1/4 of Section 28, and Lot 3 of Starlite Subdivision, Section 28, T2N, R8E, BHM Rapid City, Pennington County, South Dakota more fully described as follows: Commencing at intersection of the southerly edge of East Mall Drive right-of-way, and the easterly edge of Dyess Avenue right-of-way, and the point of beginning; Thence, first course: S89°58’23”E, along the southerly edge of said East Mall Drive right-of-way, a distance of 1017.22 feet; Thence, second course: N89°51’21”E, along the southerly edge of said East Mall Drive right-of-way, a distance of 30.10 feet; Thence, third course: S00°00’00”E, a distance of 463.07 feet; Thence, fourth course: S46°19’30”E, a distance of 112.25 feet; Thence, fifth course: S00°00’00”E, a distance of 376.79 feet, to a point on the northerly edge of Interstate 90 right-of-way; Thence, sixth course: N89°50’04”W, along the northerly edge of said Interstate 90 right-of-way, a distance of 261.04 feet, to the southeasterly corner of Lot 3 of Starlite Subdivision; Thence, seventh course: N89°44’25”W, along the northerly edge of said Interstate 90 right-of-way, common to the southerly boundary of said Lot 3, a distance of 300.04 feet; Thence, eighth course: N67°13’25”W, along the northerly edge of said Interstate 90 right-of-way, common to the southerly boundary of said Lot 3, a distance of 279.40 feet, to the northwesterly corner of said Lot 3; Thence, ninth course: N67°13’25”W, along the northerly edge of said Interstate 90 right-of-way, a distance of 278.24 feet, to the easterly edge of said Dyess Avenue right-of-way; Thence, tenth course: N08°55’12”W, along the easterly edge of said Dyess Avenue right-of-way, a distance of 342.56 feet; Thence, eleventh course: N00°01’28”W, along the easterly edge of said Dyess Avenue right-of-way, a distance of 361.37 feet, to the intersection of the southerly edge of said East Mall Drive right-of-way, and the easterly edge of said Dyess Avenue right-of-way, and the point of beginning, more generally described as being located northeast of the intersection of Dyess Avenue and Interstate 90 north and south of East Mall Drive.


PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION:
Planning Commission recommended that the Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change the land use designation from General Commercial with a Planned Commercial Development to Light Industrial with a Planned Industrial Development be approved.

VOTE: (7 to 0 with Braun, Brewer, Christianson, Gregg, Kinniburgh, Marchand and Rippentrop voting yes and none voting no)