No. 06CA051 - Section 4, T1N, R8E

A request by Dream Design International, Inc. to consider an application for an Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan by revising the Elk Vale Neighborhood Future Land Use Plan by changing the land use designation from a Planned Residential Development with a maximum density of 1.5 dwelling units per acre to Medium Density Residential with a Planned Residential Development on a parcel of land located in Government Lot 3, Section 4, T1N, R8E, BHM, Pennington County, South Dakota, more fully described as follows: Commencing at the northeast corner of said Lot 3, said point being coincident with the north one-quarter corner of said Section 4, T1N, R8E, BHM, Pennington County, South Dakota, and said corner being marked by a brass cap; Thence, S20º34’30”W, a distance of 484.38 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning; Thence, curving to the left on a curve with a radius of 326.00 feet, an arc length of 148.64 feet, a delta of 26º07’24”, a chord bearing of S13º00’08”W with a chord distance of 147.35 feet; Thence, S00º03’34”E, a distance of 108.52 feet, more or less; Thence, S89º50’20”W, a distance of 968.82 feet, more or less; Thence, N00º00’48”W, a distance of 181.83 feet, more or less; Thence, curving to the left on a curve with a radius of 226.00 feet, an arc length of 71.32 feet, a delta of 18º04’50”, and a chord bearing of N09º03’14”W with a chord distance of 71.02 feet; Thence, N89º50’20”E, a distance of 1013.08 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning, more generally described as being located at the western terminus of East Anamosa Street.


PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION:
Planning Commission
recommended that the Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan by revising the Elk Vale Neighborhood Future Land Use Plan by changing the land use designation from a Planned Residential Development with a maximum density of 1.5 dwelling units per acre to Medium Density Residential with a Planned Residential Development be approved.

VOTE: (9 to 0 with Brewer, Brown, Collins, Gregg, Hennies, Landguth, LeMay, Runde and Waltman voting yes and none voting no)