No. 06PL171 - Elysian Heights Subdivision

A request by Fisk Land Surveying for Harley Taylor to consider an application for a Preliminary Plat on Lots 1 thru 8, Elysian Heights Subdivision and the dedicated Right-of-way, located in the N1/2 SW1/4, Section 21, T1N, R7E, BHM, Rapid City, Pennington County, South Dakota, legally described as a parcel of land located in the N½ SW¼ of Section 21, T1N, R7E, BHM, Pennington County, South Dakota, more fully described as follows: Beginning at the northeast corner of the N½ SW¼ of said Section 21, said point being also known as the center of said Section 21 and said point being coincident with the southwest corner of Lot R of Block 3 of Westview Estates (as shown on the plat recorded in Plat Book 21 page 102) and also coincident with the northwest corner of Lot 9 of Block 3 of Wildwood Subdivision (as shown on the plat recorded in Plat Book 18 on Page 75), said point being marked by a rebar with cap “LS 1019”; thence, southerly along the north-south quarter section line and along the west line of said Lot 9 of Block 3 of Wildwood Subdivision, S00º00’48”E, a distance of 170.74 feet more or less, to the southwest corner of said Lot 9 of Block 3, of Wildwood Subdivision, said point being coincident with the northwest corner of Lot 10 of Block 3 of Wildwood Subdivision, and said point being marked by a rebar with cap “FISK LS 1771”; thence, continuing southerly along the center quarter section line and along the west line of said Lot 10 of Block 3 of Wildwood Subdivision, S00º03‘36”W, a distance of 655.65 feet more or less, to the southwest corner of said Lot 10 of Block 3 of Wildwood Subdivision, said point being coincident with a point on the northerly line of Lot 11 of Block 3 of Wildwood Subdivision (as shown on the plat recorded in Plat Book 18 on Page 75), and said point being marked by a rebar with cap “FISK LS 1771”; thence, southwesterly along the northwesterly line of said Lot 11 of Block 3 of Wildwood Subdivision, S32º53’42”W, a distance of 67.03 feet more or less, to the westerly corner of said Lot 11 of Block 3 of Wildwood Subdivision, said point being coincident with the north corner of Lot 12 of Block 3 of Wildwood Subdivision (as shown on the plat recorded in Plat Book 17 on Page 187), and said point being marked by a rebar with cap “FISK LS 1771”; thence, southwesterly along the northwesterly line of said Lot 12 of Block 3 of Wildwood Subdivision, S32º58’25”W, a distance of 65.94 feet more or less, to the northwest corner of said Lot 12 in Block 3 of Wildwood Subdivision, said point being coincident with the north corner of Lot 13R of Block 3 of Wildwood Subdivision (as shown on the plat recorded in Plat Book 30 on Page 34), and said point being marked by a rebar with cap “FISK LS 1771”; thence, S90º00’00”W, a distance of 704.97 feet more or less; thence, North, a distance of 747.30 feet more or less; thence, N69º00’53”W, a distance of 37.22 feet more or less; thence, southwesterly and curving to the right on a curve with a radius of 492.26 feet, a delta of 02º26’04”, an arc length of 20.92 feet more or less, and a chord bearing of S25º13’48”W, and a chord distance of 20.91 feet, more or less; thence, N63º33’10”W, a distance of 100.00 feet more or less; thence, northeasterly and curving to the left on a curve with a radius of 392.26 feet, a delta of 09º44’59”, an arc length of 66.75 feet more or less, and a chord bearing of N21º34’20”E, and a chord distance of 66.67 feet, more or less; thence, S83º00’00”W, a distance of 363.67 feet more or less; thence, S04º41’43”E, a distance of 202.00 feet more or less; thence, S35º35’41”W, a distance of 163.11 feet more or less, to a point on the 1/16th section line; thence, S89º47’34”W, a distance of 331.70 feet more or less, to a point on the 1/256th section line; thence, northerly along said 1/256th section line, N00º12’26”W, a distance of 463.97 feet more or less, to a point on the east-west one-quarter section line of said Section 21, said point also being located on the south line of Lot 9 of Block 5 of Westview Estates Subdivision (as shown on the plat recorded in Plat Book 27 on Page 177); thence, easterly along said one-quarter section line and along the south line of said Lot 9 of Block 5 of Westview Estates and along the south line of Lot 1 of Block 5 of Westview Estates (as shown on the plat recorded in plat Book 27 on Page 177), N89º47’51”E, a distance of 331.81 feet, more or less, to a point on the north-south 1/16th section line, said point being marked by a rebar; thence, continuing easterly along said one-quarter section line and along the south line of said Lot One (1) of Block Five (5) of Westview Estates, N89º46’54”E, a distance of 272.14 feet more or less, to a point marked by a rebar; thence, continuing easterly along said one-quarter section line and along the south line of said Lot 1 of Block 5 of Westview Estates and along the south line of Carriage Hills Drive right-of-way, N89º51’26”E, a distance of 270.78 feet more or less, to the southeast corner of the terminus of Carriage Hills Drive, said point also being coincident with the southwest corner of Lot 27 of Block 3 of Westview Estates (as shown on the plat recorded in Plat Book 27 on page 177), said point being marked by a rebar with survey cap “LS 2652”; thence, continuing easterly along said one-quarter section line and along the south line of said Lot 27 of Block 3 of Westview Estates, N89º50’31”E, a distance of 224.99 feet, more or less, said point being marked by a rebar with cap “FISK LS 1771”; thence, continuing easterly along said one-quarter section line and along the south line of said Lot 27 of Block 3 of Westview Estates, N89º48’02”E, a distance of 29.61 feet more or less, to the southeast corner of said Lot 27 of Block 3 of Westview Estates, said point also being coincident with the southwest corner of Lot 26R of Block 3 of Westview Estates (as shown on the plat recorded in plat Book 27 on page 177), said point being marked by a rebar with cap “LS 2652”; thence, continuing easterly along said one-quarter section line and along the south line of said Lot 26R of Block 3 of Westview Estates, N89º52’45”E, a distance of 100.03 feet more or less, to a point marked by a rebar with cap “LS 2652”; thence, continuing easterly along said one-quarter section line and along the south line of said Lot 26R of Block 3 of Westview Estates, N89º46’22”E, a distance of 165.37 feet more or less, said point being marked by a rebar with cap “FISK LS 1771”; thence, continuing easterly along said one-quarter section line and along the south line of said Lot 26R of Block 3 of Westview Estates, N89º48’13”E, a distance of 134.59 feet more or less, to the southeast corner of said Lot 26R of Block 3 of Westview Estates, said point being coincident with the southwest corner of Lot R of Block 3 of Westview Estates, and said point being marked by a rebar with cap “LS 2652”; thence, continuing easterly along said one-quarter section line and along the south line of said Lot R of Block 3 of Westview Estates, N89º48’06”E, a distance of 130.02 feet more or less, to the point of beginning, more generally described as being located at the southern terminus of Carriage Hills Drive.


STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Preliminary Plat be continued to the December 4, 2006 City Council meeting as the stipulations of approval have not been met.

PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION:
Planning Commission recommended that the Preliminary Plat be approved with the following stipulations:

1.

Prior to Preliminary Plat approval by the City Council, all necessary changes shall be made to the construction plans as identified on the red lined drawings. In addition, the red lined drawings shall be returned to the Growth Management Department;

2.

Prior to Preliminary Plat approval by the City Council, all construction plans and final Engineering Reports shall be sealed by a Registered Professional Engineer;

3.

Prior to Preliminary Plat approval by the City Council, a drainage plan in compliance with the Arrowhead Drainage Basin Design Plan shall be submitted for review and approval. In particular, the drainage plan shall include calculations demonstrating that developed flows from the site do not exceed pre-developed flows. In addition, the plat document shall be revised to provide drainage easements as necessary;

4.

Prior to Preliminary Plat approval by the City Council, a water system analysis prepared by a Registered Professional Engineer shall be submitted for review and approval verifying that sufficient quantities for domestic and fire flows are being provided. If it is determined that the water main along Carriage Hills Drive shall be oversized to serve future development within the area, then a request for reimbursement of the oversize cost(s) shall be submitted to City Council for review and approval. In addition, the construction plans shall be revised accordingly;

5.

Prior to Preliminary Plat approval by the City Council, the plat document shall be revised to show a non-access easement along Lot 1 as it abuts Carriage Hills Drive and the first 50 feet of all corner lot(s) or an Exception to the Street Design Criteria Manual shall be obtained;

6.

Prior to Preliminary Plat approval by the City Council, a cost estimate of the subdivision improvements shall be submitted for review and approval;

7.

Prior to submittal of a Final Plat application, the plat document shall be revised to show an eight foot wide utility and minor drainage easement along the interior sides of all lot lines, including Lots 1 and 2 or a Variance to the Subdivision Regulations shall be obtained;

8.

Prior to submittal of a Final Plat application, the plat document shall be revised to show the subdivision name as Elysian Heights Subdivision in lieu of Davis Subdivision within the utility and drainage easement note;

9.

Upon submittal of a Final Plat application, surety for any required subdivision improvements that have not been completed shall be posted and the subdivision inspection fees shall be paid; and,

10.

Prior to the City’s acceptance of the public improvements, a warranty surety shall be submitted for review and approval as required.


VOTE: (10 to 0 with Anderson, Brewer, Brown, Collins, Derby, Gregg, Hennies, Landguth, LeMay and Waltman voting yes and none voting no)