No. 04RZ054 - Stoneridge Subdivision

A request by Dream Design International, Inc. to consider an application for a Rezoning from General Agriculture District to Medium Density Residential District on property described by metes and bounds as commencing at the center corner Section 24, T1N, R7E, BHM,  N28 31'52"E a distance of 1445.37 feet to the Point of Beginning; thence N00 02'42"E a distance of 637.08 feet; thence along the arc of a curve to the right whose radius points bears N21 26'19"W, having a radius of 532.00 feet, a central angle of 21 46'57" and an arc length of 202.25 feet; thence N89 39'23"W a distance of 480.42 feet; thence S45 11'40"W a distance of 14.11 feet; thence S00 02'42"W a distance of 405.68 feet; thence along the arc of a curve to the right whose radius points bears N89 57'18"W, having a radius of 330.00 feet, a central angle of 24 38'03" and an arc length of 141.88 feet; thence S60 48'44"E a distance of 95.30 feet; thence S89 40'51"E a distance of 634.83 feet to the Point of Beginning. Containing an area of 9.5 acres, more generally described as being located northwest of Fifth Street and Catron Boulevard.


Staff recommends that the rezoning request be continued to the January 3, 2005 City Council meeting as the stipulations have not been met.

PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION:

Planning Commission recommended that the Rezoning from General Agriculture District to Medium Density Residential District be approved with the following stipulations:
1. Approval will be in conjunction with the related Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan.
2. Approval will be in conjunction with the related Planned Development Designation.
3. Prior to the City Council approval, the applicant shall obtain approval of an approach permit for the construction of a full street intersection on Catron Boulevard west of 5 th Street as shown on the concept plan.
4. Prior to City Council approval, a revised legal description must be submitted.  

VOTE: (7-0 with Nash, Brown, Fast Wolf, Schmidt, Prairie Chicken, Anderson and Hadcock all voting yes and none voting no)