U.S. Highway 16 Study Area
Contour Map


No. 04CA032 – Comprehensive Plan Amendment
A request by City of Rapid City to consider an application for an Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan adopting the U.S. Highway 16 Neighborhood Area Future Land Use Plan on property generally described as being located north of Cathedral Drive, south along U.S. Highway 16 approximately one mile either side of U.S. Highway 16 to south of Reptile Gardens.


PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION:
Planning Commission recommended that the Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan adopting the U.S. Highway 16 Neighborhood Area Future Land Use Plan be approved as submitted with the following amendments:

1. Property located in the NE1/4 NE1/4, SE1/4 NE1/4 and the E1/2 SE1/4 of Section 26, T1N, R7E, BHM, Pennington County, South Dakota be designated as a Planned Residential Development with 4.8 dwelling units per acre with an option to designate park land within the property boundary;

2. Property located in the W1/2 SE1/4 and the SE1/4 SE1/4 of Section 35, T1N, R7E, BHM, Pennington County, South Dakota, known as the proposed Hyland Park Subdivision, be designated as a Planned Residential Development with 2.5 dwelling units per acre;

3. Property located north of the proposed collector road in the SE1/4 SW1/4, Section 26, T1N, R7E, BHM, Pennington County, South Dakota be designated as a Planned Residential Development with 2.5 dwelling units per acre and the property located south of the proposed collector road in the SE1/4 SW1/4, Section 26, T1N, R7E, BHM, Pennington County, South Dakota be designated as a Planned Residential Development with two dwelling units per acre; and

4. Staff bring forward proposed changes to the Major Street Plan as identified on the revised draft of the U.S. Highway 16 Neighborhood Area Future Land Use Map including changes to the density calculations to reflect the proposed land use designation changes identified on the referenced map and as amended.

VOTE: (6 to 2 with Brown, Rodriguez, Schmidt, Anderson, Prairie Chicken and Lemay voting yes and Hadcock and Nash voting no)